Nissan Terrano 1996 vs Jeep Grand Cherokee 2001
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.4 Petrol | 2.7 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 118 HP | 163 HP | |
| Torque: | 191 NM | 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 14.3 seconds | 11.2 seconds | |
|
Jeep Grand Cherokee is a more dynamic driving. Nissan Terrano engine produces 45 HP less power than Jeep Grand Cherokee, whereas torque is 209 NM less than Jeep Grand Cherokee. Due to the lower power, Nissan Terrano reaches 100 km/h speed 3.1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 12.3 | 9.7 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 12.1 l/100km | 11.0 l/100km | |
|
The Jeep Grand Cherokee is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Nissan Terrano consumes 2.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Jeep Grand Cherokee, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Nissan Terrano could require 390 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Nissan Terrano consumes 1.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Jeep Grand Cherokee. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 80 litres | 78 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 650 km in combined cycle | 800 km in combined cycle | |
| 770 km on highway | 960 km on highway | ||
| 660 km with real consumption | 700 km with real consumption | ||
| Jeep Grand Cherokee gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 520'000 km | 480'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 11 years | 3 years | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Nissan Terrano might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Jeep Grand Cherokee engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.66 m | 4.61 m | |
| Width: | 1.76 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.85 m | 1.84 m | |
| Nissan Terrano is 5 cm longer than the Jeep Grand Cherokee, 8 cm narrower, while the height of Nissan Terrano is 1 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 115 litres | 1104 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1900 litres | 2047 litres | |
|
Jeep Grand Cherokee has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Nissan Terrano has 989 litres less trunk space than the Jeep Grand Cherokee. This could mean that the Nissan Terrano uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Jeep Grand Cherokee (by 147 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 11.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Nissan Terrano is 0.5 metres less than that of the Jeep Grand Cherokee, which means Nissan Terrano can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`800 | 2`506 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 2200 | 3400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Terrano has
|
Jeep Grand Cherokee has
| |