Nissan Terrano 1996 vs Jeep Cherokee 2001
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.4 Petrol | 2.4 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing belt | |
| Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 118 HP | 147 HP | |
| Torque: | 191 NM | 224 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 14.3 seconds | 13.9 seconds | |
|
Jeep Cherokee is a more dynamic driving. Nissan Terrano engine produces 29 HP less power than Jeep Cherokee, whereas torque is 33 NM less than Jeep Cherokee. Due to the lower power, Nissan Terrano reaches 100 km/h speed 0.4 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 12.3 | 10.6 | |
|
The Jeep Cherokee is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Nissan Terrano consumes 1.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Jeep Cherokee, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Nissan Terrano could require 255 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 80 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 650 km in combined cycle | 660 km in combined cycle | |
| 770 km on highway | 810 km on highway | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 11 years | 15 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used only for this car | Installed on at least 7 other car models, including Chrysler Grand Voyager, Chrysler Voyager, Dodge Grand Caravan | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Jeep Cherokee might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Jeep Cherokee engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
| Jeep Cherokee 2001 2.4 engine: This engine features a thin-walled cast-iron cylinder block, an aluminum cylinder head with dual overhead camshafts, a timing belt system, two balance shafts, hydraulic lifters, a dual-mass flywheel, and a dampened crankshaft pulley. It has received numerous ... More about Jeep Cherokee 2001 2.4 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.66 m | 4.44 m | |
| Width: | 1.76 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.85 m | 1.87 m | |
| Nissan Terrano is 22 cm longer than the Jeep Cherokee, 6 cm narrower, while the height of Nissan Terrano is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 115 litres | 909 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1900 litres | 1951 litres | |
|
Jeep Cherokee has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Nissan Terrano has 794 litres less trunk space than the Jeep Cherokee. This could mean that the Nissan Terrano uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Jeep Cherokee (by 51 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 10.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Nissan Terrano is 0.5 metres more than that of the Jeep Cherokee, which means Nissan Terrano can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`800 | 2`359 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 2200 | 5000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Terrano has
|
Jeep Cherokee has
| |