Nissan Terrano 1996 vs Suzuki Grand Vitara 2000
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.4 Petrol | 2.5 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 118 HP | 158 HP | |
| Torque: | 191 NM | 213 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 14.3 seconds | 11.1 seconds | |
|
Suzuki Grand Vitara is a more dynamic driving. Nissan Terrano engine produces 40 HP less power than Suzuki Grand Vitara, whereas torque is 22 NM less than Suzuki Grand Vitara. Due to the lower power, Nissan Terrano reaches 100 km/h speed 3.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 12.3 | 10.9 | |
|
The Suzuki Grand Vitara is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Nissan Terrano consumes 1.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Suzuki Grand Vitara, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Nissan Terrano could require 210 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 80 litres | 66 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 650 km in combined cycle | 600 km in combined cycle | |
| 770 km on highway | 790 km on highway | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 11 years | 9 years | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Suzuki Grand Vitara engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.66 m | 4.22 m | |
| Width: | 1.76 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.85 m | 1.74 m | |
| Nissan Terrano is 45 cm longer than the Suzuki Grand Vitara, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Nissan Terrano is 11 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 115 litres | 258 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1900 litres | 1080 litres | |
| Despite its longer length, Nissan Terrano has 143 litres less trunk space than the Suzuki Grand Vitara. This could mean that the Nissan Terrano uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Nissan Terrano (by 820 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 9.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Nissan Terrano is 2 metres more than that of the Suzuki Grand Vitara, which means Nissan Terrano can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`800 | 1`950 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 2200 | 2200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Suzuki Grand Vitara has
| |