Nissan Terrano 1993 vs Mitsubishi Pajero 1994
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.7 Diesel | 2.8 Diesel | |
Camshaft drive: | no data | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 101 HP | 125 HP | |
Torque: | 221 NM | 292 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 19.9 seconds | 17.3 seconds | |
Mitsubishi Pajero is a more dynamic driving. Nissan Terrano engine produces 24 HP less power than Mitsubishi Pajero, whereas torque is 71 NM less than Mitsubishi Pajero. Due to the lower power, Nissan Terrano reaches 100 km/h speed 2.6 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.1 | 12.4 | |
The Nissan Terrano is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Nissan Terrano consumes 2.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Pajero, which means that by driving the Nissan Terrano over 15,000 km in a year you can save 345 litres of fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 80 litres | 92 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 790 km in combined cycle | 740 km in combined cycle | |
Nissan Terrano gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
Average engine lifespan: | 530'000 km | 520'000 km | |
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
Engine production duration: | 22 years | 13 years | |
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Nissan Terrano might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.58 m | 4.70 m | |
Width: | 1.74 m | 1.70 m | |
Height: | 1.81 m | 1.88 m | |
Nissan Terrano is 12 cm shorter than the Mitsubishi Pajero, 4 cm wider, while the height of Nissan Terrano is 7 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 115 litres | 1080 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1900 litres | 2050 litres | |
Mitsubishi Pajero has more luggage space. Nissan Terrano has 965 litres less trunk space than the Mitsubishi Pajero. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mitsubishi Pajero (by 150 litres). | |||
Turning diameter: | 11.5 meters | 11.8 meters | |
The turning circle of the Nissan Terrano is 0.3 metres less than that of the Mitsubishi Pajero. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 2`580 | 3`300 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | below average | average | |
Mitsubishi Pajero has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Nissan Terrano has serious deffects in 115 percent more cases than Mitsubishi Pajero, so Mitsubishi Pajero quality is probably significantly better | |||
Average price (€): | no data | 4400 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Terrano has
|
Mitsubishi Pajero has
| |