Nissan Terrano 1993 vs Opel Frontera 1995
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.7 Diesel | 2.8 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 101 HP | 113 HP | |
| Torque: | 221 NM | 242 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 19.9 seconds | 16.8 seconds | |
|
Opel Frontera is a more dynamic driving. Nissan Terrano engine produces 12 HP less power than Opel Frontera, whereas torque is 21 NM less than Opel Frontera. Due to the lower power, Nissan Terrano reaches 100 km/h speed 3.1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.1 | 11.0 | |
|
The Nissan Terrano is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Nissan Terrano consumes 0.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Opel Frontera, which means that by driving the Nissan Terrano over 15,000 km in a year you can save 135 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 80 litres | 80 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 790 km in combined cycle | 720 km in combined cycle | |
| Nissan Terrano gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.58 m | 4.21 m | |
| Width: | 1.74 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.81 m | 1.70 m | |
| Nissan Terrano is 37 cm longer than the Opel Frontera, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Nissan Terrano is 11 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 115 litres | 300 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1900 litres | 1160 litres | |
| Despite its longer length, Nissan Terrano has 185 litres less trunk space than the Opel Frontera. This could mean that the Nissan Terrano uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Nissan Terrano (by 740 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.5 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Nissan Terrano is 0.9 metres more than that of the Opel Frontera, which means Nissan Terrano can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`580 | 2`510 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | average | |
| Opel Frontera has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Nissan Terrano has serious deffects in 110 percent more cases than Opel Frontera, so Opel Frontera quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | no data | 1600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Terrano has
|
Opel Frontera has
| |