Nissan Terrano 1993 vs Land Rover Range Rover 1994
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.7 Diesel | 2.5 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | no data | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 101 HP | 136 HP | |
| Torque: | 221 NM | 270 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 19.9 seconds | 15.3 seconds | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover is a more dynamic driving. Nissan Terrano engine produces 35 HP less power than Land Rover Range Rover, whereas torque is 49 NM less than Land Rover Range Rover. Due to the lower power, Nissan Terrano reaches 100 km/h speed 4.6 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.1 | 10.6 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 11.4 l/100km | 11.8 l/100km | |
|
By specification Nissan Terrano consumes 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Range Rover, which means that by driving the Nissan Terrano over 15,000 km in a year you can save 75 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Nissan Terrano consumes 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Range Rover. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 80 litres | 90 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 790 km in combined cycle | 840 km in combined cycle | |
| 700 km with real consumption | 760 km with real consumption | ||
| Land Rover Range Rover gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 530'000 km | 420'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Nissan Terrano engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 22 years | 8 years | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Nissan Terrano might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Land Rover Range Rover engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.58 m | 4.71 m | |
| Width: | 1.74 m | 1.89 m | |
| Height: | 1.81 m | 1.82 m | |
|
Nissan Terrano is smaller. Nissan Terrano is 13 cm shorter than the Land Rover Range Rover, 15 cm narrower, while the height of Nissan Terrano is 1 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 115 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1900 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.5 meters | 11.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Nissan Terrano is 0.4 metres less than that of the Land Rover Range Rover, which means Nissan Terrano can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`580 | 3`500 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 4000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Terrano has
|
Land Rover Range Rover has
| |