Nissan Terrano 1993 vs Mercedes G class 1993
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.4 Petrol | 2.3 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 124 HP | 126 HP | |
| Torque: | 197 NM | 190 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 14 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Nissan Terrano engine produces 2 HP less power than Mercedes G class, but torque is 7 NM more than Mercedes G class. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.4 | 15.3 | |
|
The Nissan Terrano is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Nissan Terrano consumes 3.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mercedes G class, which means that by driving the Nissan Terrano over 15,000 km in a year you can save 585 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 80 litres | 96 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 700 km in combined cycle | 620 km in combined cycle | |
| Nissan Terrano gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.58 m | 4.64 m | |
| Width: | 1.74 m | 1.69 m | |
| Height: | 1.81 m | 1.96 m | |
| Nissan Terrano is 6 cm shorter than the Mercedes G class, 5 cm wider, while the height of Nissan Terrano is 15 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 115 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1900 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.5 meters | 13.3 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Nissan Terrano is 1.8 metres less than that of the Mercedes G class, which means Nissan Terrano can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`580 | 3`500 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 29 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Terrano has
|
| |