Nissan Terrano 1993 vs Land Rover Range Rover 1994
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.4 Petrol | 2.5 Diesel | |
| Petrol engines (Nissan Terrano) are generally quieter, smoother, and better suited for short trips due to quicker warm-up times. Diesel (Land Rover Range Rover) engines, on the other hand, offer superior fuel efficiency and torque, making them ideal for long-distance driving and heavy loads. Read more: Petrol vs. Diesel: Fuel Economy and Key Differences. | |||
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 124 HP | 136 HP | |
| Torque: | 197 NM | 270 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 14 seconds | 15.3 seconds | |
| Nissan Terrano engine produces 12 HP less power than Land Rover Range Rover, whereas torque is 73 NM less than Land Rover Range Rover. Despite less power, Nissan Terrano reaches 100 km/h speed 1.3 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.4 | 10.6 | |
|
The Land Rover Range Rover is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Nissan Terrano consumes 0.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Range Rover, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Nissan Terrano could require 120 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 80 litres | 90 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 700 km in combined cycle | 840 km in combined cycle | |
| Land Rover Range Rover gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 520'000 km | 420'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Nissan Terrano engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 11 years | 8 years | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Nissan Terrano might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Land Rover Range Rover engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.58 m | 4.71 m | |
| Width: | 1.74 m | 1.89 m | |
| Height: | 1.81 m | 1.82 m | |
|
Nissan Terrano is smaller. Nissan Terrano is 13 cm shorter than the Land Rover Range Rover, 15 cm narrower, while the height of Nissan Terrano is 1 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 115 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1900 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.5 meters | 11.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Nissan Terrano is 0.4 metres less than that of the Land Rover Range Rover, which means Nissan Terrano can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`580 | 3`500 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 4000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Terrano has
|
Land Rover Range Rover has
| |