Nissan Terrano 2013 vs Seat Ateca 2016
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.5 Diesel | 1.6 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 110 HP | 115 HP | |
| Torque: | 248 NM | 250 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 10.5 seconds | |
| Nissan Terrano engine produces 5 HP less power than Seat Ateca, whereas torque is 2 NM less than Seat Ateca. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.3 | 4.3 | |
|
The Seat Ateca is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Nissan Terrano consumes 1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Seat Ateca, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Nissan Terrano could require 150 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 940 km in combined cycle | 1160 km in combined cycle | |
| Seat Ateca gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.34 m | 4.34 m | |
| Width: | 1.82 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.67 m | 1.60 m | |
|
Nissan Terrano is larger. Nissan Terrano and Seat Ateca are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 510 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Nissan Terrano is 0.4 metres less than that of the Seat Ateca, which means Nissan Terrano can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`787 | 1`910 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 22 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Seat Ateca has
| |