Nissan Terrano 2013 vs Nissan X-Trail 2007
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.5 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
| Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 110 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 248 NM | 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 11.2 seconds | |
| Nissan Terrano engine produces 40 HP less power than Nissan X-Trail, whereas torque is 72 NM less than Nissan X-Trail. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.3 | 7.1 | |
|
The Nissan Terrano is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Nissan Terrano consumes 1.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Nissan X-Trail, which means that by driving the Nissan Terrano over 15,000 km in a year you can save 270 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 65 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 940 km in combined cycle | 910 km in combined cycle | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 8 years | 14 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 22 other car models, including Nissan Qashqai, Renault Laguna, Renault Scenic, Dacia Duster, Nissan Juke | Installed on at least 10 other car models, including Nissan Qashqai, Renault Laguna, Renault Scenic, Opel Vivaro | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Nissan X-Trail engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.34 m | 4.63 m | |
| Width: | 1.82 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.67 m | 1.68 m | |
| Nissan Terrano is 29 cm shorter than the Nissan X-Trail, 4 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 479 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Nissan Terrano is 0.4 metres less than that of the Nissan X-Trail, which means Nissan Terrano can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`787 | 2`000 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 5000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Terrano has
|
Nissan X-Trail has
| |