Nissan Terrano 2013 vs Mitsubishi ASX 2016
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.5 Diesel | 1.6 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 110 HP | 114 HP | |
| Torque: | 248 NM | 270 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 11.5 seconds | |
| Nissan Terrano engine produces 4 HP less power than Mitsubishi ASX, whereas torque is 22 NM less than Mitsubishi ASX. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.3 | 5.0 | |
|
The Mitsubishi ASX is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Nissan Terrano consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi ASX, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Nissan Terrano could require 45 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 940 km in combined cycle | 1200 km in combined cycle | |
| Mitsubishi ASX gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Ground clearance: | 205 mm (8.1 inches) | 180 mm (7.1 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Nissan Terrano can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this Nissan Terrano version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions. Choose from three 4x4 versions of Nissan Terrano 2013 if off-road driveability is important to you. | |||
| Nissan Terrano 2013 1.5 engine: The engine has many modifications, is sufficiently common and spare parts are available. The fuel consumption/power ratio is good. The fuel injection system can be a problem and the timing belt change interval ... More about Nissan Terrano 2013 1.5 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.34 m | 4.36 m | |
| Width: | 1.82 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.67 m | 1.63 m | |
| Nissan Terrano is 1 cm shorter than the Mitsubishi ASX, 1 cm wider, while the height of Nissan Terrano is 5 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 419 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1219 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Nissan Terrano is 0.2 metres less than that of the Mitsubishi ASX. | |||
| Power steering: | Hydraulic power steering | Electric power steering | |
| Hydraulic power steering is technologically more complex, louder, increases fuel consumption and requires more servicing. It has the advantages of more power, less strain on the car's electrical system and better feedback (feeling) when steering. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`787 | 1`980 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | high | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 11 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Terrano has
|
Mitsubishi ASX has
| |