Nissan Terrano 2013 vs Land Rover Defender 2019
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.5 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
| Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 110 HP | 200 HP | |
| Torque: | 248 NM | 430 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 10.2 seconds | |
| Nissan Terrano engine produces 90 HP less power than Land Rover Defender, whereas torque is 182 NM less than Land Rover Defender. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.3 | 8.8 | |
|
The Nissan Terrano is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Nissan Terrano consumes 3.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Defender, which means that by driving the Nissan Terrano over 15,000 km in a year you can save 525 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 83 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 940 km in combined cycle | 940 km in combined cycle | |
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 8 years | 8 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 22 other car models, including Nissan Qashqai, Renault Laguna, Renault Scenic, Dacia Duster, Nissan Juke | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Jaguar XF, Land Rover Range Rover Evoque, Jaguar E-Pace | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Nissan Terrano might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Land Rover Defender engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
| Nissan Terrano 2013 1.5 engine: The engine has many modifications, is sufficiently common and spare parts are available. The fuel consumption/power ratio is good. The fuel injection system can be a problem and the timing belt change interval ... More about Nissan Terrano 2013 1.5 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.34 m | 4.32 m | |
| Width: | 1.82 m | 2.00 m | |
| Height: | 1.67 m | 1.97 m | |
| Nissan Terrano is 2 cm longer than the Land Rover Defender, 17 cm narrower, while the height of Nissan Terrano is 30 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 397 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1563 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 12 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Nissan Terrano is 1.6 metres less than that of the Land Rover Defender, which means Nissan Terrano can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Power steering: | Hydraulic power steering | Electric power steering | |
| Hydraulic power steering is technologically more complex, louder, increases fuel consumption and requires more servicing. It has the advantages of more power, less strain on the car's electrical system and better feedback (feeling) when steering. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`787 | 2`970 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 67 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Terrano has
|
Land Rover Defender has
| |