Nissan Terrano 2014 vs Mitsubishi ASX 2016
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 114 HP | 117 HP | |
| Torque: | 156 NM | 154 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.5 seconds | 11.4 seconds | |
|
Mitsubishi ASX is a more dynamic driving. Nissan Terrano engine produces 3 HP less power than Mitsubishi ASX, but torque is 2 NM more than Mitsubishi ASX. Due to the lower power, Nissan Terrano reaches 100 km/h speed 2.1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.2 | 6.1 | |
|
The Mitsubishi ASX is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Nissan Terrano consumes 2.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi ASX, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Nissan Terrano could require 315 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 63 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 600 km in combined cycle | 1030 km in combined cycle | |
| 710 km on highway | 1260 km on highway | ||
| Mitsubishi ASX gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 21 years | 15 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Renault Megane | Used only for this car | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Nissan Terrano might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.34 m | 4.30 m | |
| Width: | 1.82 m | 1.77 m | |
| Height: | 1.66 m | 1.63 m | |
|
Nissan Terrano is larger. Nissan Terrano is 5 cm longer than the Mitsubishi ASX, 5 cm wider, while the height of Nissan Terrano is 4 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 408 litres | 384 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1219 litres | |
|
Nissan Terrano has more luggage capacity. Nissan Terrano has 24 litres more trunk space than the Mitsubishi ASX. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Nissan Terrano is 0.2 metres less than that of the Mitsubishi ASX. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`826 | 1`870 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | high | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 11 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Terrano has
|
Mitsubishi ASX has
| |