Nissan Terrano 2002 vs Mitsubishi Pajero 2003
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 2.7 - 3.0 (diesel) | 3.2 - 3.5 (petrol, diesel) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 125 - 154 HP | 165 - 202 HP | |
| Torque: | 278 - 343 NM | 318 - 373 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.5 - 16.7 seconds | 10 - 13.8 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.1 - 9.9 | 9.1 - 13.8 | |
|
On average, a Nissan Terrano with diesel engines consumes about the same amount of fuel per 100 km as a Mitsubishi Pajero. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.73 m | 4.72 m | |
| Width: | 1.76 m | 1.90 m | |
| Height: | 1.81 m | 1.86 m | |
| Nissan Terrano is 1 cm longer than the Mitsubishi Pajero, 14 cm narrower, while the height of Nissan Terrano is 5 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 115 litres | 415 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1900 litres | 1700 litres | |
| Despite its longer length, Nissan Terrano has 300 litres less trunk space than the Mitsubishi Pajero. This could mean that the Nissan Terrano uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Nissan Terrano (by 200 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`933 | ~ 2`670 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 3200 | 3800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Terrano has
|
Mitsubishi Pajero has
| |