Nissan Terrano 2002 vs Toyota 4-Runner 1995
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Nissan Terrano is available only with four wheel (4x4) drive, while Toyota 4-Runner can be equipped with rear wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive. All-wheel drive models tend to consume more fuel, so if you don't need off road capabilities, Toyota 4-Runner also offers 2-wheel drive versions for fuel economy. 2WD versions also have lower maintenance costs. | |||
| Engines: | 2.7 - 3.0 (diesel) | 2.7 - 3.4 (petrol, diesel) | |
| Both cars are available with diesel engines. Toyota 4-Runner is available also with petrol engines. Petrol engines typically offer smoother operation and quicker acceleration compared to other engine types. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 125 - 154 HP | 125 - 185 HP | |
| Torque: | 278 - 343 NM | 240 - 295 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.5 - 16.7 seconds | 10.1 - 14.7 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.1 - 9.9 | 11.2 - 16.0 | |
|
On average, Nissan Terrano equipped with diesel engines consume 2.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Toyota 4-Runner. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.73 m | 4.64 m | |
| Width: | 1.76 m | 1.73 m | |
| Height: | 1.81 m | 1.73 m | |
|
Nissan Terrano is larger. Nissan Terrano is 9 cm longer than the Toyota 4-Runner, 3 cm wider, while the height of Nissan Terrano is 8 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 115 litres | 1263 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1900 litres | 2257 litres | |
|
Toyota 4-Runner has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Nissan Terrano has 1148 litres less trunk space than the Toyota 4-Runner. This could mean that the Nissan Terrano uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Toyota 4-Runner (by 357 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`933 | ~ 2`392 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 3200 | 5800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Terrano has
|
Toyota 4-Runner has
| |