Nissan Terrano 2002 vs Ford Explorer 2002
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Nissan Terrano is available only with four wheel (4x4) drive, while Ford Explorer can be equipped with rear wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive. All-wheel drive models tend to consume more fuel, so if you don't need off road capabilities, Ford Explorer also offers 2-wheel drive versions for fuel economy. 2WD versions also have lower maintenance costs. | |||
| Engines: | 2.7 - 3.0 | 4.0 - 5.4 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 125 - 154 HP | 212 - 304 HP | |
| Torque: | 278 - 343 NM | 344 - 495 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.5 - 16.7 seconds | 8.6 - 9.4 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.1 - 9.9 | 13.0 - 14.6 | |
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.73 m | 4.81 m | |
| Width: | 1.76 m | 1.83 m | |
| Height: | 1.81 m | 1.81 m | |
|
Nissan Terrano is smaller. Nissan Terrano is 8 cm shorter than the Ford Explorer, 7 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 115 litres | 391 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1900 litres | no data | |
|
Ford Explorer has more luggage space. Nissan Terrano has 276 litres less trunk space than the Ford Explorer. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`933 | ~ 2`595 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 3200 | 4600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Terrano has
|
Ford Explorer has
| |