Nissan Terrano 2000 vs Toyota RAV4 2000
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Nissan Terrano is available only with four wheel (4x4) drive, while Toyota RAV4 can be equipped with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive. All-wheel drive models tend to consume more fuel, so if you don't need off road capabilities, Toyota RAV4 also offers 2-wheel drive versions for fuel economy. 2WD versions also have lower maintenance costs. | |||
| Engines: | 2.4 - 2.7 | 1.8 - 2.4 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 118 - 125 HP | 116 - 161 HP | |
| Torque: | 191 - 278 NM | 161 - 250 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 14.3 - 17.4 seconds | 10.6 - 12.2 seconds | |
| In general, Toyota RAV4 are available with more powerful and dynamic engines than Nissan Terrano. Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.9 - 12.3 | 7.1 - 9.3 | |
|
Nissan Terrano petrol engines consumes on average 3.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than Toyota RAV4. On average, Nissan Terrano equipped with diesel engines consume 3.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota RAV4. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.70 m | 4.20 m | |
| Width: | 1.76 m | 1.74 m | |
| Height: | 1.85 m | 1.68 m | |
|
Nissan Terrano is larger. Nissan Terrano is 50 cm longer than the Toyota RAV4, 2 cm wider, while the height of Nissan Terrano is 17 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 115 litres | 678 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1900 litres | 1909 litres | |
|
Toyota RAV4 has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, This could mean that the Nissan Terrano uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Toyota RAV4 (by 9 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 10.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Nissan Terrano is 0.7 metres more than that of the Toyota RAV4, which means Nissan Terrano can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | ~ 2`800 kg | ~ 1`833 kg | |
| Net weight: | ~ 1`840 kg | ~ 1`357 kg | |
| Load capacity: | ~ 960 kg | ~ 476 kg | |
| Nissan Terrano load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 50 procentiem more than Toyota RAV4. Therefore, Nissan Terrano is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | high | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 2400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Terrano has
|
Toyota RAV4 has
| |