Nissan Terrano 2000 vs Toyota Land Cruiser 1998
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 2.4 - 2.7 | 3.0 - 4.7 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 118 - 125 HP | 125 - 235 HP | |
| Torque: | 191 - 278 NM | 295 - 434 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 14.3 - 17.4 seconds | 10.7 - 14.9 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.9 - 12.3 | 9.5 - 16.6 | |
|
Nissan Terrano petrol engines consumes on average 2.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than Toyota Land Cruiser. On average, Nissan Terrano equipped with diesel engines consume 0.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Land Cruiser. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.70 m | 4.78 m | |
| Width: | 1.76 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.85 m | 1.87 m | |
|
Nissan Terrano is smaller. Nissan Terrano is 8 cm shorter than the Toyota Land Cruiser, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Nissan Terrano is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 115 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1900 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 11.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Nissan Terrano is 0.4 metres less than that of the Toyota Land Cruiser, which means Nissan Terrano can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`800 | ~ 3`033 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 7000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Terrano has
|
| |