Nissan Terrano 2000 vs Nissan X-Trail 2003
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Nissan Terrano is available only with four wheel (4x4) drive, while Nissan X-Trail can be equipped with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive. All-wheel drive models tend to consume more fuel, so if you don't need off road capabilities, Nissan X-Trail also offers 2-wheel drive versions for fuel economy. 2WD versions also have lower maintenance costs. | |||
| Engines: | 2.4 - 2.7 | 2.0 - 2.5 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 118 - 125 HP | 136 - 165 HP | |
| Torque: | 191 - 278 NM | 192 - 314 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 14.3 - 17.4 seconds | 9.9 - 13.1 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.9 - 12.3 | 7.1 - 10.0 | |
|
Nissan Terrano petrol engines consumes on average 2.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than Nissan X-Trail. On average, Nissan Terrano equipped with diesel engines consume 3.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan X-Trail. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.70 m | 4.51 m | |
| Width: | 1.76 m | 1.76 m | |
| Height: | 1.85 m | 1.70 m | |
| Nissan Terrano is 19 cm longer than the Nissan X-Trail, width is practically the same , while the height of Nissan Terrano is 15 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 115 litres | 410 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1900 litres | 1841 litres | |
| Despite its longer length, Nissan Terrano has 295 litres less trunk space than the Nissan X-Trail. This could mean that the Nissan Terrano uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Nissan Terrano (by 59 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Nissan Terrano is 0.8 metres more than that of the Nissan X-Trail, which means Nissan Terrano can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`800 | ~ 2`009 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 2600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Nissan X-Trail has
| |