Nissan Terrano 2000 vs Nissan Terrano 2002
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 2.4 - 2.7 (petrol, diesel) | 2.7 - 3.0 (diesel) | |
| Both cars are available with diesel engines. Nissan Terrano 2000 is available also with petrol engines. Petrol engines typically offer smoother operation and quicker acceleration compared to other engine types. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 118 - 125 HP | 125 - 154 HP | |
| Torque: | 191 - 278 NM | 278 - 343 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 14.3 - 17.4 seconds | 13.5 - 16.7 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.9 - 12.3 | 9.1 - 9.9 | |
|
On average, Nissan Terrano 2000 equipped with diesel engines consume 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Terrano 2002. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.70 m | 4.73 m | |
| Width: | 1.76 m | 1.76 m | |
| Height: | 1.85 m | 1.81 m | |
| Nissan Terrano 2000 is 3 cm shorter than the Nissan Terrano 2002, width is practically the same , while the height of Nissan Terrano 2000 is 4 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 115 litres | 115 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1900 litres | 1900 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`800 | ~ 2`933 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 3200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Terrano has
|
Nissan Terrano has
| |