Nissan Terrano 2000 vs Mercedes ML 1998
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 2.4 - 2.7 | 2.3 - 5.4 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 118 - 125 HP | 150 - 347 HP | |
| Torque: | 191 - 278 NM | 220 - 510 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 14.3 - 17.4 seconds | 6.9 - 12.3 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.9 - 12.3 | 9.4 - 14.4 | |
|
Nissan Terrano petrol engines consumes on average 1.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than Mercedes ML. On average, Nissan Terrano equipped with diesel engines consume 0.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mercedes ML. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.70 m | 4.60 m | |
| Width: | 1.76 m | 1.83 m | |
| Height: | 1.85 m | 1.78 m | |
| Nissan Terrano is 10 cm longer than the Mercedes ML, 7 cm narrower, while the height of Nissan Terrano is 7 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 115 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1900 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 11.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Nissan Terrano is 0.5 metres less than that of the Mercedes ML, which means Nissan Terrano can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`800 | ~ 3`008 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 2200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Terrano has
|
Mercedes ML has
| |