Nissan Terrano 2000 vs Mercedes ML 1998
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 2.4 - 2.7 | 2.3 - 5.4 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 118 - 125 HP | 150 - 347 HP | |
| Torque: | 191 - 278 NM | 220 - 510 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 14.3 - 17.4 seconds | 6.9 - 12.3 seconds | |
| In general, Mercedes ML are available with more powerful and dynamic engines than Nissan Terrano. Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.9 - 12.3 | 9.4 - 14.4 | |
|
Nissan Terrano petrol engines consumes on average 1.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than Mercedes ML. On average, Nissan Terrano equipped with diesel engines consume 0.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mercedes ML. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.70 m | 4.60 m | |
| Width: | 1.76 m | 1.83 m | |
| Height: | 1.85 m | 1.78 m | |
| Nissan Terrano is 10 cm longer than the Mercedes ML, 7 cm narrower, while the height of Nissan Terrano is 7 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 115 litres | 633 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1900 litres | 2020 litres | |
|
Mercedes ML has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, This could mean that the Nissan Terrano uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mercedes ML (by 120 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 11.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Nissan Terrano is 0.5 metres less than that of the Mercedes ML, which means Nissan Terrano can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | ~ 2`800 kg | ~ 2`722 kg | |
| Net weight: | ~ 1`840 kg | ~ 1`998 kg | |
| Load capacity: | ~ 960 kg | ~ 724 kg | |
| Nissan Terrano load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 25 procentiem more than Mercedes ML. Therefore, Nissan Terrano is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 2400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Terrano has
|
Mercedes ML has
| |