Nissan Terrano 2000 vs Lexus GX 2002
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nissan Terrano is available with both manual and automatic gearboxes, whereas Lexus GX is available only with automatic gearbox. | |||
| Engines: | 2.4 - 2.7 (petrol, diesel) | 4.7 (petrol) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 118 - 125 HP | 238 - 270 HP | |
| Torque: | 191 - 278 NM | 434 - 447 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 14.3 - 17.4 seconds | 8.4 - 8.9 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.9 - 12.3 | 12.8 - 14.7 | |
|
Nissan Terrano petrol engines consumes on average 1.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than Lexus GX. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.70 m | 4.82 m | |
| Width: | 1.76 m | 1.90 m | |
| Height: | 1.85 m | 1.88 m | |
|
Nissan Terrano is smaller. Nissan Terrano is 12 cm shorter than the Lexus GX, 14 cm narrower, while the height of Nissan Terrano is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 115 litres | 1238 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1900 litres | 2513 litres | |
|
Lexus GX has more luggage space. Nissan Terrano has 1123 litres less trunk space than the Lexus GX. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Lexus GX (by 613 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 12.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Nissan Terrano is 1 metres less than that of the Lexus GX, which means Nissan Terrano can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`800 | ~ 2`793 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 12 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Terrano has
|
Lexus GX has
| |