Nissan Terrano 1996 vs Mitsubishi Pajero 1997
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual/Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Nissan Terrano is available only with manual gearbox, whereas Mitsubishi Pajero has both automatic and manual transmission options. | |||
Engines: | 2.4 - 2.7 | 2.8 - 3.5 | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 118 - 125 HP | 125 - 208 HP | |
Torque: | 191 - 278 NM | 292 - 313 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 14.3 - 16.7 seconds | 11.3 - 19.5 seconds | |
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.5 - 12.3 | 12.4 - 14.3 | |
Nissan Terrano petrol engines consumes on average 1.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than Mitsubishi Pajero. On average, Nissan Terrano equipped with diesel engines consume 2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Pajero. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.66 m | 4.71 m | |
Width: | 1.76 m | 1.78 m | |
Height: | 1.85 m | 1.90 m | |
Nissan Terrano is smaller. Nissan Terrano is 5 cm shorter than the Mitsubishi Pajero, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Nissan Terrano is 5 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 115 litres | no data | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1900 litres | no data | |
Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 11.8 meters | |
The turning circle of the Nissan Terrano is 0.4 metres less than that of the Mitsubishi Pajero, which means Nissan Terrano can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`800 | ~ 3`300 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | no data | above average | |
Average price (€): | 2200 | 2800 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Terrano has
|
Mitsubishi Pajero has
| |