Nissan Terrano 1996 vs Jeep Grand Cherokee 1998
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nissan Terrano is available only with manual gearbox, whereas Jeep Grand Cherokee has both automatic and manual transmission options. | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Nissan Terrano is available only with four wheel (4x4) drive, while Jeep Grand Cherokee can be equipped with rear wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive. All-wheel drive models tend to consume more fuel, so if you don't need off road capabilities, Jeep Grand Cherokee also offers 2-wheel drive versions for fuel economy. 2WD versions also have lower maintenance costs. | |||
| Engines: | 2.4 - 2.7 | 2.7 - 4.7 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 118 - 125 HP | 140 - 258 HP | |
| Torque: | 191 - 278 NM | 295 - 425 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 14.3 - 16.7 seconds | 8.3 - 14 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.5 - 12.3 | 9.7 - 16.5 | |
|
Nissan Terrano petrol engines consumes on average 2.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than Jeep Grand Cherokee. On average, Nissan Terrano equipped with diesel engines consume 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Jeep Grand Cherokee. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.66 m | 4.61 m | |
| Width: | 1.76 m | 1.85 m | |
| Height: | 1.85 m | 1.79 m | |
| Nissan Terrano is 5 cm longer than the Jeep Grand Cherokee, 9 cm narrower, while the height of Nissan Terrano is 6 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 115 litres | 1104 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1900 litres | 2047 litres | |
|
Jeep Grand Cherokee has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Nissan Terrano has 989 litres less trunk space than the Jeep Grand Cherokee. This could mean that the Nissan Terrano uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Jeep Grand Cherokee (by 147 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 11.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Nissan Terrano is 0.5 metres less than that of the Jeep Grand Cherokee, which means Nissan Terrano can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`800 | ~ 2`447 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 2200 | 3400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Terrano has
|
Jeep Grand Cherokee has
| |