Nissan Terrano 1993 vs Opel Frontera 1992

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

 
Nissan Terrano
1993 - 1996
Opel Frontera
1992 - 1996
Gearbox: Manual Manual
Wheel drive type: All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)Rear wheel drive (RWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)
Nissan Terrano is available only with four wheel (4x4) drive, while Opel Frontera can be equipped with rear wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive. All-wheel drive models tend to consume more fuel, so if you don't need off road capabilities, Opel Frontera also offers 2-wheel drive versions for fuel economy. 2WD versions also have lower maintenance costs.
Engines: 2.4 - 2.72.0 - 2.8

Performance

Power: 101 - 124 HP113 - 115 HP
Torque: 197 - 221 NM170 - 242 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 14 - 19.9 seconds16.8 - 17.9 seconds
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 10.1 - 11.410.9 - 12.1
Nissan Terrano petrol engines consumes on average 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than Opel Frontera. On average, Nissan Terrano equipped with diesel engines consume 0.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Opel Frontera.
This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!

Dimensions

Length: 4.58 m4.21 m
Width: 1.74 m1.78 m
Height: 1.81 m1.70 m
Nissan Terrano is 37 cm longer than the Opel Frontera, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Nissan Terrano is 11 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 115 litres300 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1900 litres1160 litres
Despite its longer length, Nissan Terrano has 185 litres less trunk space than the Opel Frontera. This could mean that the Nissan Terrano uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Nissan Terrano (by 740 litres).
Turning diameter: 11.5 meters10.6 meters
The turning circle of the Nissan Terrano is 0.9 metres more than that of the Opel Frontera, which means Nissan Terrano can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): ~ 2`580~ 2`303
Safety: no datano data
Quality:
below average

average
Average price (€): no data1600
Pros and Cons: Nissan Terrano has
  • lower fuel consumption
Opel Frontera has
  • also available in 2WD
  • roomier boot
  • better manoeuvrability
  • fewer faults
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv