Nissan Terrano 1993 vs Mercedes G class 1993
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nissan Terrano is available only with manual gearbox, whereas Mercedes G class has both automatic and manual transmission options. | |||
| Engines: | 2.4 - 2.7 | 2.3 - 5.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 101 - 124 HP | 95 - 296 HP | |
| Torque: | 197 - 221 NM | 190 - 456 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 14 - 19.9 seconds | 7.7 - 24.8 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.1 - 11.4 | 12.1 - 17.0 | |
|
Nissan Terrano petrol engines consumes on average 4.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than Mercedes G class. On average, Nissan Terrano equipped with diesel engines consume 3.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mercedes G class. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.58 m | 4.64 m | |
| Width: | 1.74 m | 1.71 m | |
| Height: | 1.81 m | 1.95 m | |
| Nissan Terrano is 6 cm shorter than the Mercedes G class, 3 cm wider, while the height of Nissan Terrano is 14 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 115 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1900 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.5 meters | 13.3 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Nissan Terrano is 1.8 metres less than that of the Mercedes G class, which means Nissan Terrano can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`580 | ~ 3`311 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 29 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Terrano has
|
Mercedes G klase has
| |