Nissan Terrano 1993 vs Land Rover Range Rover 1988
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nissan Terrano is available only with manual gearbox, whereas Land Rover Range Rover has both automatic and manual transmission options. | |||
| Engines: | 2.4 - 2.7 | 2.5 - 4.2 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 101 - 124 HP | 113 - 203 HP | |
| Torque: | 197 - 221 NM | 265 - 340 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 14 - 19.9 seconds | 11 - 19.8 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.1 - 11.4 | 8.7 - 15.9 | |
|
Nissan Terrano petrol engines consumes on average 3.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than Land Rover Range Rover. On average, Nissan Terrano equipped with diesel engines consume 0.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Range Rover. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.58 m | 4.50 m | |
| Width: | 1.74 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.81 m | 1.80 m | |
| Nissan Terrano is 8 cm longer than the Land Rover Range Rover, 8 cm narrower, while the height of Nissan Terrano is 1 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 115 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1900 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.5 meters | 11.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Nissan Terrano is 0.4 metres less than that of the Land Rover Range Rover, which means Nissan Terrano can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`580 | ~ 3`500 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 9800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Terrano has
|
Land Rover Range Rover has
| |