Nissan Terrano 2013 vs Jeep Grand Cherokee 1998
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Nissan Terrano is available with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive, while Jeep Grand Cherokee can be equipped with rear wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive. All-wheel drive models tend to consume more fuel, so if you don't need off road capabilities, Nissan Terrano also offers 2-wheel drive versions for fuel economy. 2WD versions also have lower maintenance costs. | |||
| Engines: | 1.5 - 2.0 | 2.7 - 4.7 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 85 - 143 HP | 140 - 258 HP | |
| Torque: | 156 - 248 NM | 295 - 425 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.4 - 13.5 seconds | 8.3 - 14 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.9 - 8.3 | 9.7 - 16.5 | |
|
Nissan Terrano petrol engines consumes on average 7 litres less fuel per 100 km than Jeep Grand Cherokee. On average, Nissan Terrano equipped with diesel engines consume 6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Jeep Grand Cherokee. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Ground clearance: | 205 mm (8.1 inches) | 210 - 211 mm (8.3 - 8.3 inches) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.34 m | 4.61 m | |
| Width: | 1.82 m | 1.85 m | |
| Height: | 1.67 m | 1.79 m | |
|
Nissan Terrano is smaller. Nissan Terrano is 27 cm shorter than the Jeep Grand Cherokee, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Nissan Terrano is 12 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 475 litres | 1104 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 2047 litres | |
|
Jeep Grand Cherokee has more luggage space. Nissan Terrano has 629 litres less trunk space than the Jeep Grand Cherokee. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 11.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Nissan Terrano is 1.5 metres less than that of the Jeep Grand Cherokee, which means Nissan Terrano can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`796 | ~ 2`447 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 3400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Terrano has
|
Jeep Grand Cherokee has
| |