Nissan Terrano 2013 vs Seat Ateca 2016
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.5 - 2.0 | 1.0 - 2.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 85 - 143 HP | 115 - 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 156 - 248 NM | 200 - 340 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.4 - 13.5 seconds | 8.3 - 11 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.9 - 8.3 | 4.3 - 5.3 | |
|
Nissan Terrano petrol engines consumes on average 2.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than Seat Ateca. On average, Nissan Terrano equipped with diesel engines consume 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Seat Ateca. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.34 m | 4.34 m | |
| Width: | 1.82 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.67 m | 1.60 m | |
|
Nissan Terrano is larger. Nissan Terrano and Seat Ateca are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 475 litres | 510 litres | |
|
Seat Ateca has more luggage space. Nissan Terrano has 35 litres less trunk space than the Seat Ateca. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Nissan Terrano is 0.4 metres less than that of the Seat Ateca, which means Nissan Terrano can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`796 | ~ 1`937 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 22 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Seat Ateca has
| |