Nissan Terrano 2013 vs Nissan X-Trail 2007
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.5 - 2.0 | 2.0 - 2.5 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 85 - 143 HP | 141 - 173 HP | |
| Torque: | 156 - 248 NM | 196 - 360 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.4 - 13.5 seconds | 9.8 - 12.5 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.9 - 8.3 | 7.1 - 9.6 | |
|
Nissan Terrano petrol engines consumes on average 1 litres less fuel per 100 km than Nissan X-Trail. On average, Nissan Terrano equipped with diesel engines consume 2.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Nissan X-Trail. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Ground clearance: | 205 mm (8.1 inches) | 200 mm (7.9 inches) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.34 m | 4.63 m | |
| Width: | 1.82 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.67 m | 1.68 m | |
| Nissan Terrano is 29 cm shorter than the Nissan X-Trail, 4 cm wider, while the height of Nissan Terrano is 1 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 475 litres | 479 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1742 litres | |
| Nissan Terrano has 4 litres less trunk space than the Nissan X-Trail. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Nissan Terrano is 0.4 metres less than that of the Nissan X-Trail, which means Nissan Terrano can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`796 | ~ 2`079 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 4600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Terrano has
|
| |