Nissan Terrano 2013 vs Land Rover Defender 2019
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nissan Terrano is available with both manual and automatic gearboxes, whereas Land Rover Defender is available only with automatic gearbox. | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Nissan Terrano is available with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive, while Land Rover Defender can be equipped only with four wheel (4x4) drive. All-wheel drive models tend to consume more fuel, so if you don't need off road capabilities, Nissan Terrano also offers 2-wheel drive versions for fuel economy. 2WD versions also have lower maintenance costs. | |||
| Engines: | 1.5 - 2.0 | 2.0 - 5.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 85 - 143 HP | 200 - 525 HP | |
| Torque: | 156 - 248 NM | 400 - 650 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.4 - 13.5 seconds | 5.2 - 10.2 seconds | |
| In general, Land Rover Defender are available with more powerful and dynamic engines than Nissan Terrano. Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.9 - 8.3 | 7.6 - 14.5 | |
|
Nissan Terrano petrol engines consumes on average 4.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than Land Rover Defender. On average, Nissan Terrano equipped with diesel engines consume 2.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Defender. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 205 mm (8.1 inches) | 226 - 295 mm (8.9 - 11.6 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Land Rover Defender can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.34 m | 4.50 m | |
| Width: | 1.82 m | 2.00 m | |
| Height: | 1.67 m | 1.97 m | |
|
Nissan Terrano is smaller. Nissan Terrano is 16 cm shorter than the Land Rover Defender, 17 cm narrower, while the height of Nissan Terrano is 31 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 475 litres | 1355 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
no data | 1563 litres | |
|
Land Rover Defender has more luggage space. Nissan Terrano has 880 litres less trunk space than the Land Rover Defender. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 12 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Nissan Terrano is 1.6 metres less than that of the Land Rover Defender, which means Nissan Terrano can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | ~ 1`796 kg | ~ 2`986 kg | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 51 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Terrano has
|
Land Rover Defender has
| |