Nissan Serena 1993 vs Mitsubishi Space Wagon 1992
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing belt | |
| Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 140 HP | 133 HP | |
| Torque: | 181 NM | 176 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.2 seconds | 13 seconds | |
|
Nissan Serena is more dynamic to drive. Nissan Serena engine produces 7 HP more power than Mitsubishi Space Wagon, whereas torque is 5 NM more than Mitsubishi Space Wagon. Thanks to more power Nissan Serena reaches 100 km/h speed 0.8 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.1 | 10.8 | |
| Nissan Serena consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Space Wagon, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Nissan Serena could require 45 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 540 km in combined cycle | 550 km in combined cycle | |
| 720 km on highway | 680 km on highway | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Front-wheel drive cars (Mitsubishi Space Wagon) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (Nissan Serena) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 13 years | 45 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Nissan Primera, Nissan Almera Tino | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Mitsubishi Lancer, Mitsubishi Outlander | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Mitsubishi Space Wagon might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.32 m | 4.50 m | |
| Width: | 1.71 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.84 m | 1.58 m | |
| Nissan Serena is 19 cm shorter than the Mitsubishi Space Wagon, 1 cm wider, while the height of Nissan Serena is 26 cm higher. | |||
| Seats: | no data | 7 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | 350 litres | 212 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | no data | 212 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | 350 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
620 litres | 1714 litres | |
| The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mitsubishi Space Wagon (by 1094 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 11 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`225 | 1`980 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | below average | high | |
| Mitsubishi Space Wagon has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Nissan Serena has serious deffects in 80 percent more cases than Mitsubishi Space Wagon, so Mitsubishi Space Wagon quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | no data | 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Serena has
|
Mitsubishi Space Wagon has
| |