Nissan Serena 1995 vs Honda CR-V 2002
| Body: | Minivan / MPV | Crossover / SUV | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Crossovers and SUVs have better off-road capabilities (higher ground clearance, can have 4x4 drive), they are preferable for driving on unpaved roads and rural areas. Also, the driver's seating position is higher in a crossover or SUVs, which provides better visibility also in city. This usually comes at the cost of higher fuel consumption, increased weight and higher maintenance costs. | |||
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
| Engine: | 2.3 Diesel | 2.4 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 75 HP | 162 HP | |
| Torque: | 145 NM | 220 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 26.5 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Nissan Serena engine produces 87 HP less power than Honda CR-V, whereas torque is 75 NM less than Honda CR-V. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.6 | 10.1 | |
|
The Nissan Serena is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Nissan Serena consumes 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Honda CR-V, which means that by driving the Nissan Serena over 15,000 km in a year you can save 75 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 58 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 620 km in combined cycle | 570 km in combined cycle | |
| 860 km on highway | 610 km on highway | ||
| Nissan Serena gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
|
Honda CR-V 2002: Car has Honda`s real-time four-wheel drive system, which sends torque to the front wheels under normal conditions. Multi-plate clutch transfers torque to rear axle when wheel slip is detected (pressure is applied to clutch by dual pump system). To allow ABS to work smoothly, the clutch is also disengaged during braking. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.32 m | 4.54 m | |
| Width: | 1.71 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.84 m | 1.71 m | |
|
Nissan Serena is smaller, but higher. Nissan Serena is 22 cm shorter than the Honda CR-V, 7 cm narrower, while the height of Nissan Serena is 13 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 350 litres | 525 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
620 litres | 952 litres | |
|
Honda CR-V has more luggage space. Nissan Serena has 175 litres less trunk space than the Honda CR-V. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Honda CR-V (by 332 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`225 | 1`910 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | low | above average | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 2000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Serena has
|
Honda CR-V has
| |