Nissan Serena 2010 vs Audi Q5 2012
| Body: | Minivan / MPV | Crossover / SUV | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Crossovers and SUVs have better off-road capabilities (higher ground clearance, can have 4x4 drive), they are preferable for driving on unpaved roads and rural areas. Also, the driver's seating position is higher in a crossover or SUVs, which provides better visibility also in city. This usually comes at the cost of higher fuel consumption, increased weight and higher maintenance costs. | |||
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 147 HP | 245 HP | |
| Torque: | 210 NM | 350 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13 seconds | 7.1 seconds | |
|
Audi Q5 is a more dynamic driving. Nissan Serena engine produces 98 HP less power than Audi Q5, whereas torque is 140 NM less than Audi Q5. Due to the lower power, Nissan Serena reaches 100 km/h speed 5.9 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 6.9 | |
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.77 m | 4.63 m | |
| Width: | 1.73 m | 1.90 m | |
| Height: | 1.85 m | 1.63 m | |
| Nissan Serena is 14 cm longer than the Audi Q5, 17 cm narrower, while the height of Nissan Serena is 22 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 521 litres | 460 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1560 litres | |
|
Nissan Serena has more luggage capacity. Nissan Serena has 61 litres more trunk space than the Audi Q5. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 11.6 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 2`490 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | high | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 14 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Serena has
|
Audi Q5 has
| |