Nissan Serena 2010 vs Toyota Hiace 2004
Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 129 HP | 133 HP | |
Torque: | 187 NM | 182 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | n/a seconds | |
Nissan Serena engine produces 4 HP less power than Toyota Hiace, but torque is 5 NM more than Toyota Hiace. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | no data | |
Drive type | |||
Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
Front-wheel drive cars (Nissan Serena) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (Toyota Hiace) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.77 m | 4.70 m | |
Width: | 1.73 m | 1.70 m | |
Height: | 1.85 m | 1.98 m | |
Nissan Serena is larger, but lower. Nissan Serena is 8 cm longer than the Toyota Hiace, 3 cm wider, while the height of Nissan Serena is 13 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 521 litres | no data | |
Turning diameter: | no data | no data | |
Gross weight (kg): | no data | no data | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | no data | no data | |
Average price (€): | no data | 5600 |