Nissan Serena 2010 vs Audi Q5 2012
| Body: | Minivan / MPV | Crossover / SUV | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Crossovers and SUVs have better off-road capabilities (higher ground clearance, can have 4x4 drive), they are preferable for driving on unpaved roads and rural areas. Also, the driver's seating position is higher in a crossover or SUVs, which provides better visibility also in city. This usually comes at the cost of higher fuel consumption, increased weight and higher maintenance costs. | |||
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 129 HP | 245 HP | |
| Torque: | 187 NM | 350 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 7.1 seconds | |
| Nissan Serena engine produces 116 HP less power than Audi Q5, whereas torque is 163 NM less than Audi Q5. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 6.9 | |
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.77 m | 4.63 m | |
| Width: | 1.73 m | 1.90 m | |
| Height: | 1.85 m | 1.63 m | |
| Nissan Serena is 14 cm longer than the Audi Q5, 17 cm narrower, while the height of Nissan Serena is 22 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 521 litres | 460 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1560 litres | |
|
Nissan Serena has more luggage capacity. Nissan Serena has 61 litres more trunk space than the Audi Q5. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 11.6 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 2`490 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | high | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 14 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Serena has
|
Audi Q5 has
| |