Nissan Serena 2005 vs Mazda Premacy 2001
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing belt | |
| Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 137 HP | 131 HP | |
| Torque: | 200 NM | 170 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 12.1 seconds | |
| Nissan Serena engine produces 6 HP more power than Mazda Premacy, whereas torque is 30 NM more than Mazda Premacy. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 9.4 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 58 litres | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 15 years | 7 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Nissan X-Trail, Nissan Qashqai | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Mazda 323, Mazda MPV | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Nissan Serena might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.69 m | 4.34 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.84 m | 1.60 m | |
| Nissan Serena is 35 cm longer than the Mazda Premacy, width is practically the same , while the height of Nissan Serena is 24 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 420 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1848 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Nissan Serena is 0.2 metres more than that of the Mazda Premacy. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`610 | 1`795 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Serena has
|
Mazda Premacy has
| |