Nissan Serena 2000 vs Volkswagen Sharan 2000
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.5 Diesel | 1.9 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 115 HP | |
| Torque: | 280 NM | 310 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13 seconds | 13.7 seconds | |
|
Nissan Serena is more dynamic to drive. Nissan Serena engine produces 35 HP more power than Volkswagen Sharan, but torque is 30 NM less than Volkswagen Sharan. Thanks to more power Nissan Serena reaches 100 km/h speed 0.7 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 6.3 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 70 litres | |
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.52 m | 4.63 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.83 m | 1.73 m | |
|
Nissan Serena is smaller, but higher. Nissan Serena is 11 cm shorter than the Volkswagen Sharan, 12 cm narrower, while the height of Nissan Serena is 10 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 520 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | 10.9 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`160 | 2`000 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | low | |
| Nissan Serena has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Volkswagen Sharan has serious deffects in 25 percent more cases than Nissan Serena, so Nissan Serena quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 1400 | 2200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Serena has
|
| |