Nissan Serena 2000 vs Toyota Picnic 1997
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.5 Diesel | 2.2 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 90 HP | |
| Torque: | 280 NM | 205 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13 seconds | 13.9 seconds | |
|
Nissan Serena is more dynamic to drive. Nissan Serena engine produces 60 HP more power than Toyota Picnic, whereas torque is 75 NM more than Toyota Picnic. Thanks to more power Nissan Serena reaches 100 km/h speed 0.9 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 7.7 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 60 litres | |
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.52 m | 4.53 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.83 m | 1.62 m | |
|
Nissan Serena is smaller, but higher. Nissan Serena is 1 cm shorter than the Toyota Picnic, width is practically the same , while the height of Nissan Serena is 21 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 520 litres | 180 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1840 litres | |
|
Nissan Serena has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Nissan Serena has 340 litres more trunk space than the Toyota Picnic. The Toyota Picnic may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 11 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`160 | 2`010 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | high | |
| Average price (€): | 1400 | 2200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Serena has
|
Toyota Picnic has
| |