Nissan Serena 2000 vs Volkswagen Sharan 2000
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 145 HP | 115 HP | |
| Torque: | 186 NM | 170 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 15 seconds | 15.2 seconds | |
|
Nissan Serena is more dynamic to drive. Nissan Serena engine produces 30 HP more power than Volkswagen Sharan, whereas torque is 16 NM more than Volkswagen Sharan. Thanks to more power Nissan Serena reaches 100 km/h speed 0.2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.3 | 9.4 | |
|
The Nissan Serena is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Nissan Serena consumes 1.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Sharan, which means that by driving the Nissan Serena over 15,000 km in a year you can save 165 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 720 km in combined cycle | 740 km in combined cycle | |
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.52 m | 4.63 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.83 m | 1.73 m | |
|
Nissan Serena is smaller, but higher. Nissan Serena is 11 cm shorter than the Volkswagen Sharan, 12 cm narrower, while the height of Nissan Serena is 10 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 520 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 10.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Nissan Serena is 0.1 metres more than that of the Volkswagen Sharan. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`060 | 1`800 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | low | |
| Nissan Serena has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Volkswagen Sharan has serious deffects in 25 percent more cases than Nissan Serena, so Nissan Serena quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 1400 | 2200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Serena has
|
| |