Nissan Serena 2000 vs Mazda Premacy 2001
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing belt | |
| Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 145 HP | 131 HP | |
| Torque: | 186 NM | 170 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 15 seconds | 12.1 seconds | |
| Nissan Serena engine produces 14 HP more power than Mazda Premacy, whereas torque is 16 NM more than Mazda Premacy. Despite the higher power, Nissan Serena reaches 100 km/h speed 2.9 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.3 | 9.4 | |
|
The Nissan Serena is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Nissan Serena consumes 1.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mazda Premacy, which means that by driving the Nissan Serena over 15,000 km in a year you can save 165 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 58 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 720 km in combined cycle | 610 km in combined cycle | |
| Nissan Serena gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 280'000 km | 630'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Mazda Premacy engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 12 years | 7 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Nissan X-Trail, Nissan Primera, Nissan Sentra | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Mazda 323, Mazda MPV | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Nissan Serena might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.52 m | 4.34 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.83 m | 1.60 m | |
| Nissan Serena is 18 cm longer than the Mazda Premacy, width is practically the same , while the height of Nissan Serena is 23 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 520 litres | 420 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1848 litres | |
|
Nissan Serena has more luggage capacity. Nissan Serena has 100 litres more trunk space than the Mazda Premacy. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Nissan Serena is 0.2 metres more than that of the Mazda Premacy. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`060 | 1`795 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | above average | |
| Mazda Premacy has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Nissan Serena has serious deffects in 65 percent more cases than Mazda Premacy, so Mazda Premacy quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 1400 | 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Serena has
|
Mazda Premacy has
| |