Nissan Serena 1995 vs Honda CR-V 2002
| Body: | Minivan / MPV | Crossover / SUV | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Crossovers and SUVs have better off-road capabilities (higher ground clearance, can have 4x4 drive), they are preferable for driving on unpaved roads and rural areas. Also, the driver's seating position is higher in a crossover or SUVs, which provides better visibility also in city. This usually comes at the cost of higher fuel consumption, increased weight and higher maintenance costs. | |||
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
| Engine: | 2.3 Diesel | 2.4 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 75 HP | 162 HP | |
| Torque: | 145 NM | 220 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 26.5 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Nissan Serena engine produces 87 HP less power than Honda CR-V, whereas torque is 75 NM less than Honda CR-V. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.3 | 10.1 | |
|
The Nissan Serena is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Nissan Serena consumes 0.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Honda CR-V, which means that by driving the Nissan Serena over 15,000 km in a year you can save 120 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 58 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 640 km in combined cycle | 570 km in combined cycle | |
| 760 km on highway | 610 km on highway | ||
| Nissan Serena gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.32 m | 4.54 m | |
| Width: | 1.71 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.84 m | 1.71 m | |
|
Nissan Serena is smaller, but higher. Nissan Serena is 22 cm shorter than the Honda CR-V, 7 cm narrower, while the height of Nissan Serena is 13 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 350 litres | 525 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
620 litres | 952 litres | |
|
Honda CR-V has more luggage space. Nissan Serena has 175 litres less trunk space than the Honda CR-V. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Honda CR-V (by 332 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`100 | 1`910 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | low | above average | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 2000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Serena has
|
Honda CR-V has
| |