Nissan Serena 1993 vs Toyota Previa 2003
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.4 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 140 HP | 156 HP | |
| Torque: | 186 NM | 225 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.2 seconds | 11 seconds | |
|
Toyota Previa is a more dynamic driving. Nissan Serena engine produces 16 HP less power than Toyota Previa, whereas torque is 39 NM less than Toyota Previa. Due to the lower power, Nissan Serena reaches 100 km/h speed 1.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.1 | 9.4 | |
|
The Toyota Previa is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Nissan Serena consumes 1.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Previa, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Nissan Serena could require 255 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 75 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 540 km in combined cycle | 790 km in combined cycle | |
| 720 km on highway | 930 km on highway | ||
| Toyota Previa gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 13 years | 19 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Nissan Primera, Nissan Almera Tino | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Toyota RAV4, Toyota Camry | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Toyota Previa might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Nissan Serena engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
| Toyota Previa 2003 2.4 engine: A fairly robust engine, easy to maintain and spare parts are readily available. Not too sensitive to fuel quality. High oil consumption and relatively short chain life (around 170 000 km). | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.32 m | 4.78 m | |
| Width: | 1.71 m | 1.79 m | |
| Height: | 1.84 m | 1.78 m | |
|
Nissan Serena is smaller, but higher. Nissan Serena is 47 cm shorter than the Toyota Previa, 8 cm narrower, while the height of Nissan Serena is 6 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 350 litres | 495 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
620 litres | 2370 litres | |
|
Toyota Previa has more luggage space. Nissan Serena has 145 litres less trunk space than the Toyota Previa. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Toyota Previa (by 1750 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 11.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Nissan Serena is 0.6 metres less than that of the Toyota Previa, which means Nissan Serena can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 2`225 kg | 2`240 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`550 kg | 1`630 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 675 kg | 610 kg | |
| Nissan Serena load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 10 procentiem more than Toyota Previa. Therefore, Nissan Serena is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | low | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 6000 | 1800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Serena has
|
Toyota Previa has
| |