Nissan Serena 1992 vs Mitsubishi Space Wagon 1992
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 126 HP | 133 HP | |
| Torque: | 169 NM | 176 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13 seconds | 11.2 seconds | |
|
Mitsubishi Space Wagon is a more dynamic driving. Nissan Serena engine produces 7 HP less power than Mitsubishi Space Wagon, whereas torque is 7 NM less than Mitsubishi Space Wagon. Due to the lower power, Nissan Serena reaches 100 km/h speed 1.8 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.7 | 9.8 | |
|
The Mitsubishi Space Wagon is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Nissan Serena consumes 0.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Space Wagon, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Nissan Serena could require 135 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 560 km in combined cycle | 610 km in combined cycle | |
| Mitsubishi Space Wagon gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Front-wheel drive cars (Mitsubishi Space Wagon) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (Nissan Serena) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 500'000 km | 520'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 16 years | 44 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used only for this car | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Mitsubishi Lancer, Mitsubishi Outlander | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Mitsubishi Space Wagon might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.32 m | 4.50 m | |
| Width: | 1.71 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.84 m | 1.58 m | |
| Nissan Serena is 18 cm shorter than the Mitsubishi Space Wagon, 1 cm wider, while the height of Nissan Serena is 26 cm higher. | |||
| Seats: | no data | 7 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | 350 litres | 212 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | no data | 212 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | 350 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1714 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Nissan Serena is 0.4 metres more than that of the Mitsubishi Space Wagon, which means Nissan Serena can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`060 | 1`980 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | low | above average | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Mitsubishi Space Wagon has
| |