Nissan Serena 1996 vs Mitsubishi Space Wagon 1992
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 126 HP | 133 HP | |
| Torque: | 169 NM | 176 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13 seconds | 11.2 seconds | |
|
Mitsubishi Space Wagon is a more dynamic driving. Nissan Serena engine produces 7 HP less power than Mitsubishi Space Wagon, whereas torque is 7 NM less than Mitsubishi Space Wagon. Due to the lower power, Nissan Serena reaches 100 km/h speed 1.8 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.3 | 9.8 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 11.2 l/100km | 9.7 l/100km | |
|
The Mitsubishi Space Wagon is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Nissan Serena consumes 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Space Wagon, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Nissan Serena could require 75 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Nissan Serena consumes 1.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Space Wagon. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 580 km in combined cycle | 610 km in combined cycle | |
| 700 km on highway | 770 km on highway | ||
| 530 km with real consumption | 610 km with real consumption | ||
| Mitsubishi Space Wagon gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Front-wheel drive cars (Mitsubishi Space Wagon) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (Nissan Serena) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 500'000 km | 520'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 16 years | 44 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used only for this car | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Mitsubishi Lancer, Mitsubishi Outlander | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Mitsubishi Space Wagon might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.32 m | 4.50 m | |
| Width: | 1.71 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.84 m | 1.58 m | |
| Nissan Serena is 18 cm shorter than the Mitsubishi Space Wagon, 1 cm wider, while the height of Nissan Serena is 26 cm higher. | |||
| Seats: | no data | 7 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | 350 litres | 212 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | no data | 212 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | 350 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
620 litres | 1714 litres | |
| The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mitsubishi Space Wagon (by 1094 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Nissan Serena is 0.4 metres more than that of the Mitsubishi Space Wagon, which means Nissan Serena can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`060 | 1`980 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | below average | high | |
| Mitsubishi Space Wagon has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Nissan Serena has serious deffects in 95 percent more cases than Mitsubishi Space Wagon, so Mitsubishi Space Wagon quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | no data | 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Mitsubishi Space Wagon has
| |