Nissan Serena 2010 vs Volkswagen Touran 2015
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nissan Serena is available only with automatic gearbox, whereas Volkswagen Touran has both automatic and manual transmission options. | |||
| Engines: | 2.0 (petrol) | 1.2 - 2.0 (petrol, diesel) | |
| Both cars are available with petrol engines. Volkswagen Touran is available also with diesel engines. Diesel engines typically offer better fuel efficiency and higher torque compared to other engine types. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 129 - 147 HP | 110 - 190 HP | |
| Torque: | 187 - 210 NM | 175 - 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13 seconds | 8.2 - 11.9 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 4.2 - 6.1 | |
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.77 m | 4.53 m | |
| Width: | 1.73 m | 1.83 m | |
| Height: | 1.85 m | 1.66 m | |
| Nissan Serena is 24 cm longer than the Volkswagen Touran, 10 cm narrower, while the height of Nissan Serena is 19 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 521 litres | 834 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1980 litres | |
|
Volkswagen Touran has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Nissan Serena has 313 litres less trunk space than the Volkswagen Touran. This could mean that the Nissan Serena uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 11.5 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | ~ 2`154 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 12 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Serena has
|
Volkswagen Touran has
| |
