Nissan Serena 2010 vs Ford F150 2014
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Body: | Minivan / MPV | Crossover / SUV | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Crossovers and SUVs have better off-road capabilities (higher ground clearance, can have 4x4 drive), they are preferable for driving on unpaved roads and rural areas. Also, the driver's seating position is higher in a crossover or SUVs, which provides better visibility also in city. This usually comes at the cost of higher fuel consumption, increased weight and higher maintenance costs. | |||
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Nissan Serena is available only with front wheel drive, while Ford F150 can be equipped with rear wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive. | |||
| Engines: | 2.0 | 2.7 - 4.9 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 129 - 147 HP | 282 - 385 HP | |
| Torque: | 187 - 210 NM | 343 - 570 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 10.7 - 13.8 | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.77 m | 5.89 m | |
| Width: | 1.73 m | 2.03 m | |
| Height: | 1.85 m | 1.92 m | |
|
Nissan Serena is smaller. Nissan Serena is 112 cm shorter than the Ford F150, 31 cm narrower, while the height of Nissan Serena is 7 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 521 litres | 1495 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 2200 litres | |
|
Ford F150 has more luggage space. Nissan Serena has 974 litres less trunk space than the Ford F150. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 26 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Ford F150 has
| |