Nissan Serena 2010 vs BMW 3 series 2005
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| |
Nissan Serena
2010 - 2016
|
BMW 3 series
2005 - 2008
|
| Body: |
Minivan / MPV | Estate car / wagon |
| Gearbox: |
Automatic | Manual/Automatic |
|
Nissan Serena is available only with automatic gearbox, whereas BMW 3 series has both automatic and manual transmission options. |
| Wheel drive type: |
Front wheel drive (FWD) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) |
|
Nissan Serena is available only with front wheel drive, while BMW 3 series can be equipped with rear wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive. |
| Engines: |
2.0 (petrol) | 2.0 - 3.0 (petrol, diesel) |
Performance |
|---|
| Power: |
129 - 147 HP | 122 - 306 HP |
| Torque: |
187 - 210 NM | 180 - 580 NM |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: |
13 seconds | 5.6 - 11 seconds |
|
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! |
Fuel consumption |
|---|
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): |
no data | 4.8 - 11.0 |
|
|
Dimensions |
|---|
| Length: |
4.77 m | 4.52 m |
| Width: |
1.73 m | 1.82 m |
| Height: |
1.85 m | 1.44 m |
|
Nissan Serena is 25 cm longer than the BMW 3 series, 10 cm narrower, while the height of Nissan Serena is 41 cm higher. |
| Trunk capacity: |
521 litres | 460 litres |
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1385 litres |
|
Nissan Serena has more luggage capacity.
Nissan Serena has 61 litres more trunk space than the BMW 3 series. |
| Turning diameter: |
no data | 11 meters |
| Gross weight (kg): |
no data | ~ 2`103 |
|
|
| Safety: |
no data | |
| Quality: |
no data |
average |
| Average price (€): |
no data | 4000 |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Serena has
- automatic transmission only
- only petrol engines available
- roomier boot
|
BMW 3 sērija has
- both manual and automatic
- available with 4x4 drive
- petrol and diesel engines available
|
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
|
