Nissan Serena 2000 vs Toyota Camry 2006
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
Body: | Minivan / MPV | Sedan | |
---|---|---|---|
Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
Nissan Serena is available only with automatic gearbox, whereas Toyota Camry has both automatic and manual transmission options. | |||
Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
Nissan Serena is available with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive, while Toyota Camry can be equipped only with front wheel drive. | |||
Engines: | 2.0 - 2.5 (petrol, diesel) | 2.4 - 3.5 (petrol) | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 145 - 150 HP | 167 - 272 HP | |
Torque: | 186 - 280 NM | 224 - 336 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13 - 15 seconds | 7.6 - 9.6 seconds | |
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.8 - 8.3 | 8.5 - 11.0 | |
Nissan Serena petrol engines consumes on average 1.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than Toyota Camry. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.52 m | 4.82 m | |
Width: | 1.70 m | 1.82 m | |
Height: | 1.83 m | 1.47 m | |
Nissan Serena is smaller, but higher. Nissan Serena is 30 cm shorter than the Toyota Camry, 13 cm narrower, while the height of Nissan Serena is 37 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 520 litres | 535 litres | |
Nissan Serena has 15 litres less trunk space than the Toyota Camry. | |||
Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 11 meters | |
Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`110 | ~ 1`985 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | low | no data | |
Average price (€): | 1400 | 5800 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Serena has
|
Toyota Camry has
| |