Nissan Serena 1992 vs Volkswagen Sharan 1997

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

 
Nissan Serena
1992 - 2001
Volkswagen Sharan
1997 - 2000
Gearbox: Manual/AutomaticManual/Automatic
Wheel drive type: Rear wheel drive (RWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)
Nissan Serena is available with rear wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive, while Volkswagen Sharan can be equipped with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive. All-wheel drive models tend to consume more fuel, so if you don't need off road capabilities, Nissan Serena also offers 2-wheel drive versions for fuel economy. 2WD versions also have lower maintenance costs.
Engines: 1.6 - 2.31.8 - 2.8

Performance

Power: 67 - 140 HP90 - 174 HP
Torque: 127 - 186 NM170 - 235 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 12.2 - 31 seconds11.8 - 19.3 seconds
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 8.3 - 11.16.5 - 13.6
Nissan Serena petrol engines consumes on average 1 litres less fuel per 100 km than Volkswagen Sharan. On average, Nissan Serena equipped with diesel engines consume 2.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Sharan.
This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!

Dimensions

Length: 4.32 m4.62 m
Width: 1.71 m1.81 m
Height: 1.84 m1.73 m
Nissan Serena is smaller, but higher.
Nissan Serena is 30 cm shorter than the Volkswagen Sharan, 10 cm narrower, while the height of Nissan Serena is 11 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 350 litresno data
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
620 litresno data
Turning diameter: 11.4 meters11.7 meters
The turning circle of the Nissan Serena is 0.3 metres less than that of the Volkswagen Sharan.
Gross weight (kg): ~ 2`150~ 1`940
Safety:
Quality:
low

below average
Average price (€): no data1000
Pros and Cons: Nissan Serena has
  • also available in 2WD
  • lower fuel consumption for petrol engines
Volkswagen Sharan has
  • lower fuel consumption for diesel engines
  • fewer faults
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv